cr> DBS cross ownership and TCI

1996-01-23

Craig A. Johnson

"No matter how you look at the facts, Tele-communications Inc (TCI)
should not be allowed to acquire a new DBS license," the Consumer
Project on Technology (CPT) says in its comments to the FCC on 
cross-ownership rules for direct broadcast satellite services.

We keep hearing from George Gilder and the Congressional free market
puppeteers about the competitive nirvana that will result if we only
let companies like TCI do as they wish.   

Permitting a company "that is both a major cable operator and a part
owner in one of three national DBS licenses (Primestar) to acquire
the third national DBS license" doesn't sound a lot like
"competition" in any known sense of the word.

--caj

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Date:          Tue, 23 Jan 1996 13:39:46 -0500 (EST)
From:          James Love <•••@••.•••>
To:            Multiple recipients of list <•••@••.•••>
Subject:       CPT FCC motion on DBS cross ownership and TCI


-----------------------------------------------------------------
TAP-INFO - An Internet newsletter available from •••@••.•••
-----------------------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION POLICY NOTES January 23, 1996

-    Consumer Project on Technology Asks FCC to Bar TCI and other
     cable operators from acquiring licenses for scarce "Direct
     Broadcast Satellite" (DBS) Television services.  DBS is a
     service like Direct TV or Primestar, that provides video
     programming from a satellite.  The service is supposed to
     compete against monopoly cable franchises.

-    FCC scheduled auction for third of three national DBS
     licenses for Wednesday, January 24, 1996.  On Monday the FCC
     announced that TCI would be one of three bidders for the DBS
     license.

-    TCI is largest cable company in US, an investor in Time-Warner, a
partner with US WEST in European networks, and
     major investor in Primestar, one of two current national DBS
     licenses (the other is Direct TV).

Here is the CPT motion.


           BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
       PETITION FOR RULEMAKING AND POSTPONEMENT OF AUCTION

Cross-Ownership Rules for Direct Broadcast   )
Satellite Licenses                           )


            PETITION OF CONSUMER PROJECT ON TECHNOLOGY
           ASKING THAT THE FCC SUSPEND JANUARY 24, 1996
        DBS AUCTION AND ADOPT RULES BARRING TCI AND OTHER
       OWNERS OR OPERATORS OF DBS, CABLE, OR VIDEO DIALTONE
          SYSTEMS FROM ACQUIRING ADDITIONAL DBS LICENSES

     The Consumer Project on Technology (CPT) asks the Commission to
suspend the planned DBS auction for Wednesday, January 24, 1996, and
to adopt new auction rules which prohibit cross-ownership between
entities that should be competitors. Specifically, the following
entities should be prohibited from bidding on new DBS licenses:

1.   Companies that are significant investors in cable television
     or Video Dialtone (VDT) services in the United States.  DBS
     is a service that is supposed to compete against cable or
     VDT.

2.   Companies that are significant investors in other DBS
     satellites.  These license holders should be competing
     against each other.


     The Consumer Project on Technology (CPT) is a project of the
Center for Study of Responsive Law.  The CPT (and the CSRL) is a
non-profit organization created by Ralph Nader to protect consumers
and taxpayers.  Information about the CPT is found on the Internet at
http://www.essential.org/cpt. 

     Cross-Ownership and the Consumer Interest

     The FCC should not allow either a major cable operator or a
current DBS license holder to acquire a new DBS license.  These
entities should be independent competitors.  Competition between
cable operators and DBS,  and between competing DBS license
holders.  This will not happen if the cable operators hold DBS
licenses, or if DBS licenses are jointly owned. It is incredible
and distressing that the FCC would allow a firm that is both a
major cable operator and a part owner in one of three national
DBS licenses (Primestar) to acquire the third national DBS
license.

     No matter how you look at the facts, Tele-communications Inc
(TCI) should not be allowed to acquire a new DBS license.  As the FCC
knows better than anyone, TCI is the nation's largest cable operator,
a major investor in (and sometimes partner with) Time-Warner (the
nation's second largest cable operator), a major investor in the
Primestar DBS service, and a partner with US WEST in European
telecommunications network services and in Time-Warner cable
properties.

     The only predictable result of allowing TCI to acquire an
additional DBS license will be to increase media concentration,
enhance TCI's enormous monopsony power in markets for video
content services, and eliminate an important source of
competition against cable television franchises.  Consumers and
independent content providers will be harmed if TCI is permitted
to acquire another DBS license.  Indeed, the FCC should be
requiring TCI to divest its interest in PrimeStar, not allowing
acquisition of an additional DBS license.

     If TCI is allowed to acquire the third national DBS license, it
will be an owner or major investor in two the of the three national
DBS licenses, the largest owner of cable franchises in the U.S., an
investor in Time-Warner (the second largest owner of cable franchises
in the U.S.), and a partner with US WEST, the dominate Local Exchange
Telephone company in 14 western states.

     Anti-trust remedies do not substitute for intelligent rules
on cross-ownership.  Anti-trust litigation takes several years
and millions of dollars, and is not a realistic remedy for
consumers which will be harmed by TCI's acquisition of an
additional DBS license.  It is the FCC's job to protect the
public, and to insure that public property is managed in ways
that benefit consumers and promote public interest objectives. 
Greater media concentration and the associated monopoly and
monopsony power are not in the public interest.  If the FCC
allows TCI to acquire an additional DBS license it will have
failed to protect the public.  The FCC has a responsibility to
address the predictable anticompetitive consequences of this
concentration.

     For these reasons, CPT urges the FCC to immediately suspend
the proposed DBS auction on the 24 th of January, 1996, and
reissue auction rules which prohibit TCI and other entities which own
or operate DBS licenses, cable television or Video Dialtone services
from acquiring new DBS licenses.

Sincerely,

/s/                           /s/
_________________________     __________________________
James Love                    Todd Paglia
Director                      Staff Attorney
•••@••.•••                  •••@••.•••

Consumer Project on Technology               
P.O. Box 19367                     
Washington, DC 20036
http://www.essential.org/cpt
202/387-8030

January 23, 1996

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INFORMATION POLICY NOTES is a free Internet newsletter sponsored
by the Taxpayer Assets Project (TAP) and the Consumer Project on
Technology (CPT).  Both groups are projects of the Center for
Study of Responsive Law, which is run by Ralph Nader.  The
LISTPROC services are provide by Essential Information.  Archives of
TAP-INFO are available from

http://www.essential.org/listproc/tap-info/

TAP and CPT both have Internet Web pages.

http://www.tap.org/tap
http://www.essential.org/cpt

Subscription requests to tap-info to •••@••.••• with
the message:  subscribe tap-info your name

TAP and CPT can both be reached off the net at P.O. Box 19367,
Washington, DC  20036, Voice:  202/387-8030; Fax: 202/234-5176
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


                        ~ CYBER-RIGHTS ~
 ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~
  For subscription info, archived postings/documents, and other useful
  material, visit the CPSR Cyber-Rights Web Page at:

        http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/nii/cyber-rights/

  You are encouraged to forward and cross-post list traffic,
  pursuant to any contained copyright & redistribution restrictions.
 ~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~-~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=~